SANTIAGO, Cuba — Fidel Castro’s ashes were interred in a private ceremony Sunday morning, ending nine days of mourning for the man who ruled Cuba for nearly half a century.
The military caravan bearing his remains in a flag-draped cedar
coffin left the Plaza of the Revolution in the eastern city of Santiago
at 6:39 a.m. Thousands of people lined the two-mile route to Santa
Ifigenia cemetery, waving Cuban flags and shouting “Long live Fidel!”
Photographs taken by Cuban state media showed that the interment was
presided over by Castro’s younger brother and successor, President Raul
Castro, who wore his green military uniform as he placed the older man’s
ashes into what appeared to be a niche in his tomb, a simple, grey,
round stone about 15 feet high. The niche was then covered by a plaque
bearing the single name, “Fidel.”
Those in attendance included Castro’s wife, Dalia Soto del Valle,
other members of his family and presidents Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela
and Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua, among others.
The gathering appeared to last about 90 minutes and took place
entirely out of the public eye after Cuban officials made a last-minute
cancellation of plans to broadcast the start of events live on national
and international television. International media were barred from the
event.
The tomb stood to the side of a memorial to the rebel soldiers killed
in an attack that Castro led on Santiago’s Moncada barracks on July 26,
1953, and in front of the mausoleum of Cuban national hero Jose Marti.
Before the funeral ended, martial music could be heard outside the
cemetery, where Ines de la Rosa was among the mourners gathered. She
said she would have liked to watch the interment on television, but “we
understand how they as a family also need a bit of privacy.”
Fellow mourner Elena Vinales said she wasn’t surprised that the
images of the event were not broadcast. “It seems to be a family
moment,” she said. Cuba’s President Raul Castro places the ashes of his older brother Fidel Castro into a niche in his tomb
The decision to keep the final farewell private came the morning
after Raul Castro announced that Cuba would prohibit the naming of
streets and monuments after his brother, and bar the construction of
statues of the former leader and revolutionary icon, in keeping with his
desire to avoid a cult of personality.
“The leader of the revolution rejected any manifestation of a cult of
personality and was consistent in that through the last hours of his
life, insisting that, once dead, his name and likeness would never be
used on institutions, streets, parks or other public sites, and that
busts, statutes or other forms of tribute would never be erected,” Raul
Castro told a massive crowd gathered in the eastern city of Santiago.
He said that Cuba’s National Assembly would vote in its next session
on the law fulfilling the wishes of his brother, who died last week at
90. The legislature generally holds a meeting in December and under
Cuba’s single-party system, parliament unanimously or near-unanimously
approves every government proposal.
Fidel Castro, who stepped down in 2006 after falling ill, kept his
name off public sites during his near half-century in power because he
said he wanted to avoid the development of a personality cult. In
contrast, the images of his fellow revolutionary fighters Camilo
Cienfuegos and Ernesto “Che” Guevara became common across Cuba in the
decades since their deaths.
Mourning for Castro has been fervent and intense across the country
since his death, particularly in rural eastern Cuba, where huge crowds
have been shouting Castro’s name and lining the roads to salute the
funeral procession carrying his ashes.
“All of us would like to put Fidel’s name on everything but in the
end, Fidel is all of Cuba,” said Juan Antonio Gonzalez, a 70-year-old
retired economist. “It was a decision of Fidel’s, not Raul’s, and I
think he has to be respected.”
Hillary Clinton continues to expand her lead over Donald Trump, with a new poll out Tuesday showing her ahead by double digits. Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Clinton ahead 51 percent to 41 percent– up two points from a week ago in the same survey. Clinton’s gap narrows when third party candidates are added to the options — with Clinton picking up only 43 percent, Trump 38 percent, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson 10 percent, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein notching 4 percent. The Democrat is helping herself by expanding her support among men. Two weeks ago, Trump held a 16 percentage point margin over Clinton among men, but in Tuesday’s poll, that advantage has shrunk to onl...
Gbaramatu women and Association of Gbaramu Students during the protest along Warri/Sapele road on Wednesday in Warri, Delta State, demanding the release of 10 students by the military for their alleged membership of the militant group, Niger Delta Avengers (NDA). Photo credits: The Guardian. President Muhammadu Buhari has been given 7-day ultimatum by Gbaramatu women and the National Association of Gbaramatu Students (NAGS) to secure the release 10 students arrested by the military for their alleged membership of the militant group, Niger Delta Avengers (NDA) or face a massive protest in Abuja. According to Guardian, the aggrieved women and students on Wednesday, July 13 shut down the Warri-Sapele Road in Warri, Delta state for several hours to protest the continued detention of the students. The women who were led by chief Vero Tangnowei, chanted solidarity songs brandishing placards with several inscriptions. Some of them read: “This is pure oppression, ...
No presidential candidate in polling history has been as hated by voters as Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are now. But a review of the last eight presidential elections reveals that the most hated candidate in the spring almost always ends up winning in November. This year’s top candidates have smashed all records for voter disdain. Clinton is “strongly disliked” by 37 percent of voters, topping the 32 percent who couldn’t stand George W. Bush in 2004. And the disapproval of Trump has never before been seen in presidential politics, with 53 percent rating him “strongly unfavorable.” The numbers were crunched by FiveThirtyEight, which released a set of charts comparing the “strongly unfavorable” ratings of presidential candidates stretching back to 1984. Blame the huge disapproval numbers on a polarized electorate and the celebrity status of the front-runners. But such negative numbers at this stage do not spell ballot-box doom. Over the last 32 years, all but ...
Comments